Depth perception
Dense depth maps improve spatial grounding and reduce the number of action rounds.
RGB → RGB + ground-truth depth
LIBERO-Plus subset · Table 1
How far can general-purpose intelligence go in the physical world?
A systematic study of GPT-6 Astra’s capabilities—and the boundaries of robotic manipulation.
1 Nanjing University2 Nanyang Technological University3 Peking University4 Institute of Automation of the Chinese Academy of Sciences5 Independent Researcher
* Equal contribution † Corresponding authors
Direct, closed-loop manipulation through a lightweight tool interface. No specialized action policy is used.
Semantic reasoning is a beginning.
Reliable physical execution is the next challenge.
We systematically evaluate GPT-6 Astra for closed-loop robotic manipulation through a lightweight agent execution framework. We probe depth perception, embodied in-context learning, and tactile understanding, then evaluate five manipulation benchmarks across six capability dimensions. The results reveal a gap between semantic reasoning and physical execution, especially in consequence-aware planning, precision, and complex motion coordination. We introduce LIBERO-GeoMotion to test geometry-constrained manipulation and validate the findings on a real robot. Contextual demonstrations improve execution, but motion feasibility, precise control, physical safety, and inference latency remain important limitations.
GPT-6 Astra generates tool calls and action arguments. The environment executes them and returns fresh observations for the next decision.
RGB observations, robot state, and optional depth or tactile feedback.
Instruction + interaction history + demonstration context.
End-effector position, orientation, and gripper commands through tools.
Observe()Reference()Act()Status()Finish()Controlled ablations isolate the contribution of spatial evidence, demonstration context, and contact feedback.
Dense depth maps improve spatial grounding and reduce the number of action rounds.
RGB → RGB + ground-truth depth
LIBERO-Plus subset · Table 1
Actions, video frames, and textual descriptions together provide useful motion references.
No context → combined context
LIBERO-Plus subset · Table 2
Contact feedback supports corrective actions, with the representation of force making a difference.
RGB → RGB + tactile text
UniVTAC subset · Table 3
164 tasks evaluated with demonstration context. Strong results on some benchmarks coexist with difficult precision and dexterous-control failures.
Paper §4.5 / Figure 8. Reduced evaluation protocol: 10 trials per task on LIBERO-Plus, RoboTwin 2.0, and RoboDojo; 20 on RoboCasa GR1 and UniVTAC. Results are specific to these evaluated task sets.
Generalization · Memory · Task understanding · Long-horizon execution · High-order operations · Precision
Five tasks on a ROKAE Helios robot. One related demonstration doubles the observed overall success rate, without parameter updates.
Zero-shot · 10/25
One-example ICL · 20/25
5 trials per task per condition · 50 trials total.
Task-level rates and counts follow Table 7.
LIBERO-GeoMotion tests geometry-constrained manipulation across nine task families. Familiar objects and straightforward goals put the focus on pose alignment, coordinated motion, and physically feasible execution.
Context helps.
Geometry still constrains.
@misc{zhou2026directrobotcontrol,
title = {Large Multimodal Models for Direct Robot
Control: GPT-6 as a Beginning},
author = {Zhou, Youwei and Hou, Bohan and Fu, Yankai
and Lyu, Yaoxu and Ye, Yifan and Shan, Shilin
and Guo, Chen and Liu, Jiaming and He, Ran
and Shan, Caifeng and Zhang, Shanghang
and Yang, Jianfei and Lu, Zhihe},
year = {2026},
eprint = {2610.28259},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28259}
}